74 96
References
[1]
Fossati N, Larcher A, Gadda GM, et al. Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for patients newly diagnosed with a single small renal mass. Eur Urol Focus 2015;1:66–72.[2]
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a compre- hensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844–53.[3]
Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimen- sions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009;56:786–93.
[4]
Menogue SR, O’Brien BA, Brown AL, Cohen RJ. Percutaneous core biopsy of small renal mass lesions: a diagnostic tool to better stratify patients for surgical intervention. BJU Int 2013;111:E146–51.[5]
Leveridge MJ, Finelli A, Kachura JR, et al. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol 2011;60:578–84.[6]
Psutka SP, Feldman AS, McDougal WS, McGovern FJ, Mueller P, Gervais DA. Long-term oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2013;63:486–92.[7]
Thompson RH, Atwell T, Schmit G, et al. Comparison of partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal masses. Eur Urol 2015;67:252–9.E U R O P E A N
U R O L O G Y
F O C U S
1
( 2 0 1 5
)
7 3 – 7 4
74