72 96
Statistical
analysis:
Fossati,
Sjoberg,
Vickers.
Obtaining
funding:
None.
Administrative,
technical,
or material
support:
None.
Supervision:
Montorsi, Guazzoni.
Other:
None.
Financial disclosures:
Nicola Fossati
certifies
that all conflicts of
interest,
including
specific
financial
interests
and
relationships
and
affiliations
relevant
to
the
subject matter
or materials discussed
in
the manuscript
(eg, employment/affiliation, grants or
funding,
consultancies, honoraria,
stock ownership or options, expert
testimony,
royalties, or patents filed,
received,
or
pending),
are
the
following: None.
Funding/Support
and
role
of
the
sponsor:
None.
References
[1]
Miller DC, Ruterbusch J, Colt JS. Contemporary clinical epidemiolo- gy of renal cell carcinoma: insight from a population based case- control study. J Urol 2010;184:2254–8.[2]
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, et al. Kidney cancer, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014;12:175–82.
[3]
Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010;58:398–406.[4]
Lane BR, Campbell SC, Gill IS. 10-year oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2013;190:44–9.[5]
Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Eur Urol 2009;55:1171–8.[6]
Masson-Lecomte A, Bensalah K, Seringe E, et al. A prospective com- parison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot- assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collabo- rative study. BJU Int 2013;111:256–63.
[7]
Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic versus laparo- scopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur Urol 2012;62:1023–33.[8]
Gill IS, Remer EM, Hasan WA, et al. Renal cryoablation: outcome at 3 years. J Urol 2005;173:1903–7.[9]
Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Buffi N, et al. Oncologic results of laparo- scopic renal cryoablation for clinical T1a tumors: 8 years of experi- ence in a single institution. Urology 2010;76:624–9.[10]
Kunkle DA, Uzzo RG. Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass: a meta-analysis. Cancer 2008;113:2671–80.
[11]
Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. Urology 2005; 66:23–8.[12]
Haramis G, Graversen JA, Mues AC, et al. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small ( < 3.5 cm) cortical renal masses. J Laparoen- dosc Adv Surg Tech 2012;22:152–7.
[13]
Guillotreau J, Haber G-P, Autorino R, et al. Robotic partial nephrec- tomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass. Eur Urol 2012;61:899–904.
[14]
Klatte T, Grubmu¨ ller B, Waldert M, Weibl P, Remzi M. Laparoscopic cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses: systematic review and cumulative analysis of obser- vational studies. Eur Urol 2011;60:435–43.[15]
Klatte T, Shariat SF, Remzi M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic cryoabla- tion versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal tumors. J Urol 2014;191:1209–17.[16]
Aron M, Kamoi K, Remer E, Berger A, Desai M, Gill I. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single surgeon outcomes. J Urol 2010;183: 889–95.
[17]
Larcher A, Fossati N, Lazzeri M, Buffi N, Guazzoni G. Re: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative and Oncologic Out- comes of Laparoscopic Cryoablation versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Small Renal Tumors: T. Klatte, S.F. Shariat and M. Remzi J Urol 2014; 191: 1209–1217. J Urol 2014.[18]
Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 2002; 167:469–76.
[19]
Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, et al. da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 2007;51:186–91.
[20]
Larcher A, Fossati N, Mistretta F, et al. Long-term oncologic out- comes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation as primary treatment for small renal masses. Urol Oncol 2015;33, 22.e1–9.
[21]
Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130: 461–70.
[22]
National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:S1–266.
[23]
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187–96.
[24]
Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Radiology 2005;235:728–39.
[25]
Lin Y-C, Turna B, Frota R, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for multiple ipsilateral renal tumors. Eur Urol 2008;53:1210–6.
[26]
Haber G-P, Lee MC, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Gill IS. Tumour in solitary kidney: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoa- blation. BJU Int 2012;109:118–24.
[27]
Panumatrassamee K, Kaouk JH, Autorino R, et al. Cryoablation versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for small renal masses in the solitary kidney: impact of approach on functional outcomes. J Urol 2013;189:818–22.
[28]
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a compre- hensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844–53.
[29]
Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimen- sions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing sur- gery. Eur Urol 2009;56:786–93.
E U R O P E A N
U R O L O G Y
F O C U S
1
( 2 0 1 5
)
6 6 – 7 2
72