Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  69 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 96 Next Page
Page Background

had

lower

preoperative

serum

creatinine

and

higher

eGFR.

Tumor

size was

slightly

larger

in

the MIPN

group.

These

findings

reflect

the

selection

of

less

healthier

patients

for

LRC

and

resection

for

patients with

larger

tumors.

3.2.

Intraoperative

outcomes

In MIPN

patients,

the median

ischemia

time

was

15 min

(interquartile range [IQR] 12–18). On the other hand, patients

treated with LRC

received double

freeze-thaw cycle: median

first cycle timewas 10 min (IQR10–15);median second cycle

time was 8 min

(IQR 6–10). Conversion

to open

surgery was

necessary

in

four

(1.9%) MIPN

and

two

(1.2%)

LRC

patients.

In

the

MIPN

group,

conversion

was

necessary

for

severe

adhesions

(

n

= 3)

and

severe hypercapnia

(

n

= 1).

In

the

LRC

group,

conversion

to

open

surgery was

because

of

hemor-

rhage

from

the

cryoablated

area

in both

cases. Multivariate

analysis

revealed

slightly

lower

estimated

blood

loss

for

the MIPN

group

compared

to

the

LRC

group. No

significant

differences

in

total

operative

time

and

intraoperative

complication

rate were

observed

( Table 2

).

3.3.

Perioperative

outcomes

Postoperative complications occurred

in 42

(48%) MIPN and

46

(52%)

LRC patients. Detailed

information on

the grade of

complications

is

shown

in

Table 3 .

Multivariate

analysis

revealed

that

the postoperative complication rate was

30%

lower

in

the MIPN group

than

in

the LRC group

(20% vs 28%;

adjusted difference –11%; 95% confidence

interval

[CI] –21%

to

–2%;

p

= 0.02).

The

relative

risk

for

complications

of

Clavien-Dindo grade

2 was even greater, with a

two-thirds

reduction

for

MIPN

versus

LRC

(5.8%

vs

18%;

adjusted

difference –12%, 95% CI –19%

to –4.8%;

p

= 0.001). The

length

of

in-hospital

stay was

approximately

1

d

longer

for MIPN

than

for

LRC.

There were

no

significant

differences

in

the

rate

of blood

transfusion

( Table 2 )

.

3.4.

Oncologic

outcomes

In

the

MIPN

group,

all

patients

with

a

malignant

lesion

at

final

pathology

had

pT1

disease

and were

classified

as

stage

I

according

to

the

2009

TNM

classification

system.

Median

follow-up was

similar

in

the

two groups

(43 mo

for

MIPN

and

39 mo

for

LRC).

Local

recurrence was

observed

in

six MIPN

and

four

LRC

patients, while

a

new

SRM was

diagnosed

in

four

MIPN

and

six

LRC

patients.

Distant

metastases

were

observed

in

three

MIPN

patients;

no

patient

in

the

LRC

group

developed

distant metastasis.

At

5

yr,

the

disease-free

survival

rate

was

92%

and

93%

in

the MIPN

and

LRC

groups,

respectively

( Fig. 1 A

). According

to

Cox

regression

analysis,

treatment

type

(MIPN

vs

LRC)

was

not

significantly

associated with

disease-free

survival

(hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.45–2.52;

p

= 0.9). We performed

a

sensitivity analysis

for patients with a malignant

lesion at

final

pathology

and

found

similar

results

for

both

Kaplan-

Meier analysis

( Fig. 1 B

) and Cox

regression analysis

(hazard

ratio

1.42,

95%

CI

0.54–3.70;

p

= 0.5).

3.5.

Functional

outcomes

The variation and percentage

reduction

in eGFR after surgery

are

shown

in

Figure 2 .

The

MIPN

group

had

higher

preoperative eGFR

than

the LRC group. Patients

treated with

MIPN

showed

a

higher

percentage

decrease

in

eGFR

in

the

first

6 mo

after

surgery,

as well

as

good

recovery

of

renal

function

in

the

following

2

yr,

reaching

a

plateau

approxi-

mately 3 yr after surgery. Patients treatedwith LRC showed a

similar percentage decrease

in eGFR on postoperative day 1,

followed

by

a

gradual

and

constant

percentage

reduction

over

time

( Fig. 2

B).

In multivariate

linear regression analysis,

LRC was

significantly

associated with

higher

eGFR

at

6 mo

compared

to

MIPN

(coefficient

4.68,

95%

CI

0.06–9.30;

p

= 0.047) after adjusting

for preoperative eGFR, patient age,

and

tumor

dimension.

However,

there

was

no

significant

Table

2

Intraoperative

and

postoperative

outcomes

of MIPN

compared

to

LRC

after

adjusting

for

age, ASA

score,

and

tumor

dimension

Outcome

MIPN

(

n

= 206)

LRC

(

n

= 166)

Adjusted

difference

95%

CI

p

value

Mean

blood

loss

(ml)

135

(131)

192

(338)

–73 ml

–127

to

–20 ml

0.007

Mean

operative

time

(min)

187

(63)

188

(66)

–13 min

–27

to

1 min

0.074

Intraoperative

complications

a

10

(4.9)

9

(5.4)

0%

–4%

to

4%

0.9

Blood

transfusions

a

10

(4.9)

16

(10)

–3.7%

–9.2%

to

1.2%

0.2

Postoperative

complications

42

(20)

46

(28)

–11%

–21%

to

1.5%

0.02

Clavien

complication

grade

2

a

12

(5.8)

30

(18)

–12%

–19%

to

–4.8%

0.001

Mean

length

of

stay

(d)

6

(2)

5

(2)

1

0.5–1.5

d

<

0.0001

MIPN = minimally

invasive

partial

nephrectomy;

LRC =

laparoscopic

renal

cryoablation; ASA = American

Society

of Anesthesiologists;

CI =

confidence

interval.

Continuous

data

are

presented

as mean

(standard

deviation)

and

categorical

data

as

n

(%).

a

Data were

adjusted

only

for

ASA

score

because

of

the

low

number

of

events

observed.

Table 3 – Grade of postoperative complications

for MIPN compared

to

LRC

Complications

Patients,

n

(%)

MIPN

LRC

No

complication

164

(80)

120

(72)

Clavien

grade

I

30

(14)

16

(10)

Clavien

grade

II

9

(4.5)

25

(15)

Clavien

grade

III

3

(1.5)

2

(1.2)

Clavien

grade

IV

0

(0)

3

(1.8)

MIPN = minimally

invasive

partial

nephrectomy;

LRC =

laparoscopic

renal

cryoablation.

E U R O P E A N

U R O L O G Y

F O C U S

1

( 2 0 1 5

)

6 6 – 7 2

69