Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  55 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 55 96 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

The

prognosis

of

upper

tract

urothelial

carcinoma

(UTUC)

remains

poor

due

to

a

high

rate

of

disease

relapse

after

resection

[1–4]

.

Radical

nephroureterectomy

(RNU)

is

the

gold

standard

for

the

treatment

of

nonmetastatic

UTUCs;

however,

the

5-yr

disease-specific

survival

rate

is

<

50%

for

pT2–3

tumors

and

<

10%

for

pT4

tumors

[1] .

To

predict

UTUC

outcomes,

many

researchers

have

attempted

to

identify

potent

biomarkers

using

human

tissue

and

blood

samples

[1,5,6]

, although

the vast majority of markers have

not

yet

been

applied

in

clinical

practice.

In

this

regard,

a

growing body of

evidence

suggests

the

efficacy of

systemic

inflammatory markers

from

blood

samples

for

predicting

patient

prognosis

and

pathologic

profiles

in

UTUC

[7–12]

,

and

these

biomarkers may

become

useful

because

of

their

low

cost

and

easy

accessibility.

The

associations

between

the

involvement

of

systemic

inflammation

and

cancer

development

are

now

evident.

Tumor

recruits endothelial cells,

fibroblasts, and

inflamma-

tory

cells

into

the

tumor

bed

and

then

shapes

its

unique

stroma,

suggesting

that

the

elevation

of

systemic

inflam-

matory

markers

may

reflect

the

development

of

an

inflammation-associated

microenvironment

in

tumors

[13–16]

.

In

UTUC, we

and

others

reported

the

prognostic

value of

typical preoperative

inflammatory markers

such as

neutrophil-to-lymphocyte

ratio

(NLR),

plasma

fibrinogen,

and

serum

level

of

C-reactive

protein

(CRP)

in

patients

following

RNU

[7–12]

.

In

the present

study, we hypothesize

that

combinations

of

these markers would

provide more

accurate

prognostic

models

than

a

single marker.

The

aim

of

this

study was

to

determine

the

associations

of

preoperative

NLR,

plasma

fibrinogen,

and

CRP with

clinicopathologic

features

and

to

develop multivariate models

for

prognosis

based

on

each

inflammatory marker

alone

or

in

combination.

2.

Patients

and methods

After

institutional

review

board

approval,

a

total

of

seven

Japanese

institutions—Keio

University

Hospital

and

six

affiliated

institutions—

provided data on 457 patients who underwent open or

laparoscopic RNU

for

localized UTUC between 1995 and 2011. We excluded patients with a

history

of

muscle-invasive

urothelial

carcinoma

(UC)

of

the

urinary

bladder

and

those

who

received

neoadjuvant

chemotherapies.

After

excluding patients without

a

full

set of blood data

and

those with

active

infection

accompanied

by

fever

(

>

38

8

C),

the

presence

of

hematological

Table

1

– Association

of

baseline

clinicopathologic

characteristics

and

elevation

of

preoperative

neutrophil-to-lymphocyte

ratio,

plasma

fibrinogen,

and

serum

C-reactive

protein

in

394

patients

treated with

radical

nephroureterectomy

Elevation

of

preoperative marker

levels

NLR,

n

(%)

Plasma

fibrinogen,

n

(%)

Serum

CRP,

n

(%)

Characteristic

All

patients

(

n

= 394),

n

(%)

Elevated

(

n

= 108)

Nonelevated

(

n

= 286)

p

value

Elevated

(

n

= 117)

Nonelevated

(

n

= 277)

p

value

Elevated

(

n

= 93)

Nonelevated

(

n

= 301)

p

value

Age

at

RNU

70

yr

205

(52.0)

46

(42.6)

159

(55.6)

57

(48.7)

148

(53.4)

46

(49.5)

159

(52.8)

>

70

yr

189

(48.0)

62

(57.4)

127

(44.4)

0.021

60

(51.3)

129

(46.6)

0.392

47

(50.5)

142

(47.2)

0.571

Sex

Male

289

(73.4)

77

(71.3)

212

(74.1)

84

(71.8)

205

(74.0)

68

(73.1)

221

(73.4)

Female

105

(26.6)

31

(28.7)

74

(25.9)

0.571

33

(28.2)

72

(26.0)

0.650

25

(26.9)

80

(26.6)

0.954

Tumor

location

Renal

pelvis

232

(58.9)

64

(59.3)

168

(58.7)

70

(59.8)

162

(58.5)

53

(57.0)

179

(59.5)

Ureter

162

(41.1)

44

(40.7)

118

(41.3)

0.926

47

(40.2)

115

(41.5)

0.804

40

(43.0)

122

(40.5)

0.671

Tumor

grade

G1/2

128

(32.5)

27

(25.0)

101

(35.3)

31

(26.5)

97

(35.0)

24

(25.8)

104

(34.6)

G3

266

(67.5)

81

(75.0)

185

(64.7)

0.051

86

(73.5)

180

(65.0)

0.099

69

(74.2)

197

(65.4)

0.116

Pathologic

T

stage

pTa-1

125

(31.7)

24

(22.2)

101

(35.3)

30

(25.6)

95

(34.3)

24

(25.8)

101

(33.6)

pT2

57

(14.5)

16

(14.8)

41

(14.3)

11

(9.4)

46

(16.6)

12

(12.9)

45

(15.0)

pT3

201

(51.0)

63

(58.3)

138

(48.3)

69

(59.0)

132

(47.7)

51

(54.8)

150

(49.8)

pT4

11

(2.8)

5

(4.6)

6

(2.1)

0.055

7

(6.0)

4

(1.4)

0.005

6

(6.5)

5

(1.7)

0.052

Lymphovascular

invasion

Negative

224

(56.9)

59

(54.6)

165

(57.7)

57

(48.7)

167

(60.3)

40

(43.0)

184

(61.1)

Positive

170

(43.1)

49

(45.4)

121

(42.3)

0.584

60

(51.3)

110

(39.7)

0.034

53

(57.0)

117

(38.9)

0.002

Concomitant

carcinoma

in

situ

Negative

320

(81.2)

95

(88.0)

225

(78.7)

93

(79.5)

227

(81.9)

74

(79.6)

246

(81.7)

Positive

74

(18.8)

13

(12.0)

61

(21.3)

0.035

24

(20.5)

50

(18.1)

0.567

19

(20.4)

55

(18.3)

0.641

Lymph

node

involvement

pNx

357

(90.6)

96

(88.9)

261

(91.3)

103

(88.0)

254

(91.7)

80

(86.0)

277

(92.0)

pN0

8

(2.0)

2

(1.9)

6

(2.1)

4

(3.4)

4

(1.4)

4

(4.3)

4

(1.3)

pN+

29

(7.4)

10

(9.3)

19

(6.6)

0.670

10

(8.5)

19

(6.9)

0.364

9

(9.7)

20

(6.6)

0.119

Adjuvant

chemotherapy

No

306

(77.7)

84

(77.8)

222

(77.6)

80

(68.4)

226

(81.6)

67

(72.0)

239

(79.4)

Yes

88

(22.3)

24

(22.2)

64

(22.4)

0.974

37

(31.6)

51

(18.4)

0.004

26

(28.0)

62

(20.6)

0.136

CRP = C-reactive

protein; NLR = neutrophil-to-lymphocyte

ratio;

RNU =

radical

nephroureterectomy.

E U R O P E A N

U R O L O G Y

F O C U S

1

( 2 0 1 5

)

5 4 – 6 3

55