Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  54 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 96 Next Page
Page Background

Priority

Focus

– Urothelial

Cancer

Editorial

by

Brant

Inman

and

Kae

Jack

Tay

on

pp.

64–65

of

this

issue

Impact

of

Combined Use

of

Blood-based

Inflammatory Markers

on

Patients with Upper

Tract Urothelial

Carcinoma

Following

Radical Nephroureterectomy:

Proposal

of

a

Cumulative Marker

Score

as

a Novel

Predictive

Tool

for

Prognosis

Nobuyuki

Tanaka

a ,

Eiji Kikuchi

a , * ,

Kent Kanao

a ,

Kazuhiro Matsumoto

a , b ,

Suguru

Shirotake

a ,

Yasumasa Miyazaki

a ,

Hiroaki

Kobayashi

a , c ,

Gou Kaneko

a , d ,

Masayuki Hagiwara

a , e ,

Hiroki

Ide

a , f ,

Jun Obata

a ,

Katsura Hoshino

a ,

Nozomi Hayakawa

a , b ,

Takeo Kosaka

a , g ,

Satoshi Hara

d ,

Ken Nakagawa

e ,

Masahiro

Jinzaki

h ,

Mototsugu Oya

a

a

Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo,

Japan;

b

Department of Urology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo,

Japan;

c

Department of

Urology,

Kyosai

Tachikawa

Hospital,

Tokyo,

Japan;

d

Department

of

Urology,

Kawasaki

City

Hospital,

Tokyo,

Japan;

e

Department

of

Urology,

Ichikawa

General Hospital,

Tokyo Dental

College,

Ichikawa,

Japan;

f

Department

of Urology,

Inagi

City Hospital,

Tokyo,

Japan;

g

Department

of Urology,

Irumagawa

Hospital,

Saitama,

Japan;

h

Department

of Diagnostic

Radiology,

Keio University

School

of Medicine,

Tokyo,

Japan

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y F O C U S 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 5 4 – 6 3

available

at

www.sciencedirect.com

journal

homepage:

www.europeanurology.com

Article

info

Article

history:

Accepted

February

4,

2015

Associate

Editor:

Gianluca Giannarini

Keywords:

Urothelial

carcinoma

Upper

urinary

tract

C-reactive

protein

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte

ratio

Fibrinogen

Outcome

Prognosis

Marker

score

Abstract

Background:

Previous studies showed

the prognostic

impact of preoperative

levels of neutrophil-to-

lymphocyte

ratio

(NLR), plasma

fibrinogen,

and

serum C-reactive protein

(CRP)

in

surgically

treated

upper

tract urothelial carcinoma; however,

few papers have discussed

the proper use of these

indices.

Objective:

To

investigatewhether combinations of these threemarkers, as a cumulativemarker score

(CMS),

improve

the

accuracy

of prognostic models

following

radical nephroureterectomy

(RNU).

Design,

setting, and participants:

A

total of 394 patients

from multiple

institutions were

included.

Median

follow-up was

30 mo.

Intervention:

All

patients

underwent

RNU without

neoadjuvant

chemotherapy.

Outcome measurements

and

statistical

analysis:

Associated

outcomes were

assessed

using mul-

tivariate

analysis.

The

CMS was

defined

as

the

number

of

elevated

levels

of

preoperative

NLR,

plasma

fibrinogen,

and

serum

CRP.

Results and

limitations:

Multivariate analyses

revealed

that an

increasing CMS was

independently

associated with high

rates of disease

recurrence,

cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality

following RNU. Addition of

the CMS

to a model

that

included

standard clinicopathologic predictors

significantly

improved predictive

accuracy by 2.7%

for disease

recurrence, 3.9%

for

cancer-specific

mortality, and 4.0%

for all-cause mortality, which were

the highest among other prognostic models

using

each marker

alone

or

combinations

of

two.

The

study

is

limited

by

its

retrospective nature.

Conclusions:

Although

the

use

of

each

inflammatory

marker

alone

may

be

as

predictive

as

clinicopathologic

indices

for

prognosis,

combinations

like

CMS

can

provide more

accurate

prog-

nostic models

following

RNU.

Patient

summary:

Elevation

of

blood-based

inflammatory markers may

be

useful

for

predicting

prognosis

because

of

their

low

cost

and

accessibility.

Among

blood-based

indices, we

examined

the efficacy of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, plasma fibrinogen, and serumC-reactive

protein

levels.

Although

use

of

each

marker

alone

provides

additional

prognostic

information,

the combination of all

three markers would be more predictive

than any

single marker or combina-

tions

of

two.

#

2015

European Association

of Urology.

Published

by

Elsevier B.V.

This

is

an

open

access

article

under

the

CC

BY-NC-ND

license

( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

).

* Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi,

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582,

Japan. Tel.

+81

3

5363

3825;

Fax:

+81

3

3225 1985.

E-mail

address:

eiji-k@kb3.so-net.ne.jp

(E. Kikuchi).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2015.02.001

2405-4569/

#

2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This

is an open

access

article under

the CC BY-NC-ND

license

( http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

.