Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  91 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 91 96 Next Page
Page Background

hilum,

infiltrating

the

first

portion

of

the

pancreas.

Radiologic

diagnosis

of

biliary

neoplasm

was made

with

concomitant upper urinary

tract urothelial carcinoma of

the

left kidney. Urine

cytology was negative.

Flexible

cystosco-

py was

performed,

and

no

lesion was

found. Meanwhile,

biliary duct drainage and

subsequent

stent placement were

performed, with

symptomatic

resolution and

improvement

of

liver

function,

as

investigated with

blood

tests.

Conflicts

of

interest:

The

authors

have

nothing

to

disclose.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2015.07.002

Case

Discussion:

A

Man

with

Two

Synchronous

and

Symptomatic

Malignancies

Related

to

Smoking:

The

Case

for

Primary

Chemotherapy

Maria De

Santis

a , b , *

a

University

of Warwick,

Cancer

Research Unit,

Coventry, UK

b

Ludwig

Boltzmann

Institute

for

Applied

Cancer

Research

and

ITR-Vienna,

Austria

1.

Clinical

features

This

patient

apparently

suffers

from

two

synchronous

and

symptomatic malignancies. Otherwise, he

appears

fit, with

few

comorbidities, but

is

a heavy

smoker

and

so

is

likely

to

have

occult

cardiovascular

and

pulmonary

diseases.

The

biliary neoplasm

is the cause of abdominal pain, weight

loss,

and

jaundice. The

tumour

in

the

renal pelvis

is

the

source of

gross

haematuria.

The

acute

jaundice

has

been

relieved

by

biliary

tract

drainage

and

stent

placement. As

for

the

tiny

lung

nodule,

no

firm conclusions as

to

the presence of distant metastases

are

possible.

So

far,

only

radiologic

diagnoses

have

been

obtained;

histologic

diagnosis

is

still

missing

for

both

malignancies.

2.

Discussion

Most

intrahepatic

cholangiocarcinomas

are

adenocarcino-

mas

with

variable

desmoplastic

reaction.

After

histology

has

been

secured,

the

treatment

of

choice

for

locally

advanced,

inoperable,

or

metastasized

biliary

tract

neo-

plasms

is

systemic

chemotherapy. Objective

response

rates

with gemcitabine alone range

from 7%

to 27%, and palliation

can

clearly be

achieved; however, median

survival

is

rarely

>

8 mo

[1]

.

The

combination

of

gemcitabine

plus

cisplatin

is

active

and was well

tolerated

in most

studies.

The

superiority

of

gemcitabine

plus

cisplatin

over

gemcitabine

alone

was

shown

in

the multicentre

ABC-02

trial,

with

a

significant

overall

survival

benefit

with

combination

therapy

versus

gemcitabine

alone

(11.7

vs

8.1

mo),

as

was

median

progression-free survival

(8 vs 5 mo). Toxicity was compara-

ble

in

both

groups

with

the

exception

of

some

more

haematologic

toxicity with

the

combination

[2]

.

Treatment

of

choice

for

urothelial

cancer

in

the

locally

advanced,

perioperative,

and metastatic

settings

is

cisplat-

in-based

chemotherapy.

The

gemcitabine

and

cisplatin

combination

is

generally

the

preferred

standard

option

in

most

centres

around

the world.

3.

Treatment

strategy

From

the

oncologic

point

of

view,

histology

should

be

secured before

any

firm

conclusions

are drawn

and

further

treatment

decisions

made.

In

particular,

the

biliary

neo-

plasm

apparently

is

not

amenable

to

complete

surgery.

Consequently,

a

biopsy

should

be

sought

before

further

decisions

can

be made.

As

for

the

tumour

in

the

renal pelvis,

in which urothelial

cancer

is

suspected

and,

indeed,

is

the

most

probable

histology,

complete

surgery

seems

possible

and

like

a

reasonable

way

to

proceed,

even

in

a

palliative

situation

with

regard

to

the biliary neoplasm.

Surgery of

the

tumour

in

the

renal

pelvis would

secure

the

histology

and

remove

the

source

of

symptoms

(gross

haematuria,

pain

in

later

stage)

and might

stop

local

and

distant

spread.

In

this particular patient

case, gemcitabine

and

cisplatin

combination

chemotherapy

would

fit

for

both malignan-

cies, apart

from slight variations

in

the published schedules.

If

cisplatin were

not

feasible,

gemcitabine

and

carboplatin

combinations

would

be

alternative

options

for

both

malignancies,

the

biliary

tract

cancer

and

the

urothelial

cancer

of

the

renal

pelvis.

Conflicts

of

interest:

The

author

has

nothing

to

disclose.

References

[1]

Park JS, Oh SY, Kim SH, et al. Single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005;35:68–73

.

[2]

Valle JW, Wasan H, Johnson P, et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study - The UK ABC-01 Study. Br J Cancer 2009;101:621–7

.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2014.12.003

DOI

of

original

article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2015.07.002

.

* University

of Warwick,

Cancer

Research Unit,

Coventry

CV4

7AL, UK.

E-mail

address:

M.De-Santis@warwick.ac.uk

.

E U R O P E A N

U R O L O G Y

F O C U S

1

( 2 0 1 5

)

9 0 – 9 3

91