hilum,
infiltrating
the
first
portion
of
the
pancreas.
Radiologic
diagnosis
of
biliary
neoplasm
was made
with
concomitant upper urinary
tract urothelial carcinoma of
the
left kidney. Urine
cytology was negative.
Flexible
cystosco-
py was
performed,
and
no
lesion was
found. Meanwhile,
biliary duct drainage and
subsequent
stent placement were
performed, with
symptomatic
resolution and
improvement
of
liver
function,
as
investigated with
blood
tests.
Conflicts
of
interest:
The
authors
have
nothing
to
disclose.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2015.07.002Case
Discussion:
A
Man
with
Two
Synchronous
and
Symptomatic
Malignancies
Related
to
Smoking:
The
Case
for
Primary
Chemotherapy
Maria De
Santis
a , b , *a
University
of Warwick,
Cancer
Research Unit,
Coventry, UK
b
Ludwig
Boltzmann
Institute
for
Applied
Cancer
Research
and
ITR-Vienna,
Austria
1.
Clinical
features
This
patient
apparently
suffers
from
two
synchronous
and
symptomatic malignancies. Otherwise, he
appears
fit, with
few
comorbidities, but
is
a heavy
smoker
and
so
is
likely
to
have
occult
cardiovascular
and
pulmonary
diseases.
The
biliary neoplasm
is the cause of abdominal pain, weight
loss,
and
jaundice. The
tumour
in
the
renal pelvis
is
the
source of
gross
haematuria.
The
acute
jaundice
has
been
relieved
by
biliary
tract
drainage
and
stent
placement. As
for
the
tiny
lung
nodule,
no
firm conclusions as
to
the presence of distant metastases
are
possible.
So
far,
only
radiologic
diagnoses
have
been
obtained;
histologic
diagnosis
is
still
missing
for
both
malignancies.
2.
Discussion
Most
intrahepatic
cholangiocarcinomas
are
adenocarcino-
mas
with
variable
desmoplastic
reaction.
After
histology
has
been
secured,
the
treatment
of
choice
for
locally
advanced,
inoperable,
or
metastasized
biliary
tract
neo-
plasms
is
systemic
chemotherapy. Objective
response
rates
with gemcitabine alone range
from 7%
to 27%, and palliation
can
clearly be
achieved; however, median
survival
is
rarely
>
8 mo
[1].
The
combination
of
gemcitabine
plus
cisplatin
is
active
and was well
tolerated
in most
studies.
The
superiority
of
gemcitabine
plus
cisplatin
over
gemcitabine
alone
was
shown
in
the multicentre
ABC-02
trial,
with
a
significant
overall
survival
benefit
with
combination
therapy
versus
gemcitabine
alone
(11.7
vs
8.1
mo),
as
was
median
progression-free survival
(8 vs 5 mo). Toxicity was compara-
ble
in
both
groups
with
the
exception
of
some
more
haematologic
toxicity with
the
combination
[2].
Treatment
of
choice
for
urothelial
cancer
in
the
locally
advanced,
perioperative,
and metastatic
settings
is
cisplat-
in-based
chemotherapy.
The
gemcitabine
and
cisplatin
combination
is
generally
the
preferred
standard
option
in
most
centres
around
the world.
3.
Treatment
strategy
From
the
oncologic
point
of
view,
histology
should
be
secured before
any
firm
conclusions
are drawn
and
further
treatment
decisions
made.
In
particular,
the
biliary
neo-
plasm
apparently
is
not
amenable
to
complete
surgery.
Consequently,
a
biopsy
should
be
sought
before
further
decisions
can
be made.
As
for
the
tumour
in
the
renal pelvis,
in which urothelial
cancer
is
suspected
and,
indeed,
is
the
most
probable
histology,
complete
surgery
seems
possible
and
like
a
reasonable
way
to
proceed,
even
in
a
palliative
situation
with
regard
to
the biliary neoplasm.
Surgery of
the
tumour
in
the
renal
pelvis would
secure
the
histology
and
remove
the
source
of
symptoms
(gross
haematuria,
pain
in
later
stage)
and might
stop
local
and
distant
spread.
In
this particular patient
case, gemcitabine
and
cisplatin
combination
chemotherapy
would
fit
for
both malignan-
cies, apart
from slight variations
in
the published schedules.
If
cisplatin were
not
feasible,
gemcitabine
and
carboplatin
combinations
would
be
alternative
options
for
both
malignancies,
the
biliary
tract
cancer
and
the
urothelial
cancer
of
the
renal
pelvis.
Conflicts
of
interest:
The
author
has
nothing
to
disclose.
References
[1]
Park JS, Oh SY, Kim SH, et al. Single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005;35:68–73.
[2]
Valle JW, Wasan H, Johnson P, et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study - The UK ABC-01 Study. Br J Cancer 2009;101:621–7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2014.12.003DOI
of
original
article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2015.07.002.
* University
of Warwick,
Cancer
Research Unit,
Coventry
CV4
7AL, UK.
address:
M.De-Santis@warwick.ac.uk.
E U R O P E A N
U R O L O G Y
F O C U S
1
( 2 0 1 5
)
9 0 – 9 3
91




