Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  92 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 92 96 Next Page
Page Background

Case

Discussion:

A

Man

with

Two

Synchronous

and

Symptomatic

Malignancies

Related

to

Smoking:

The

Case

for

Surgery

Renzo

Colombo

Division

of

Oncology/Urology

Unit,

Urological

Research

Institute,

IRCCS

Ospedale

San

Raffaele, Milan,

Italy

1.

Clinical

features

This

unusual

and

challenging

clinical

case

concerns

an

elderly patient with negative clinical history who presented

at

the emergency unit due

to

a

recent

appearance of

severe

symptoms

including

abdominal

pain,

jaundice,

and

gross

haematuria.

Ultrasound

and

computed

tomography

scan

were

strongly

suggestive

of

the

presence

of

two

concomitant

major

cancers:

an

advanced

biliary

neoplasm

involving

adjacent

organs

and

organ-invasive

carcinoma

at

the

left

renal

pelvis.

To

relieve

the

acute

clinical

symptoms

and

overcome

the

increasing

jaundice,

biliary

duct

drainage

with

biliary

stent

placement

was

successfully

performed

and restored both an acceptable clinical status and a normal

blood-test

setting.

2.

Discussion

The

two

cancers

identified

in

this

patient

share

some

interesting

clinical

findings.

First,

both

neoplasms

were

diagnosed

only

at

an

advanced

clinical

stage

after

a

long

period of clinical silence.

It

is recognised

that

for biliary tract

cancer,

carcinogenesis

follows

a

progression

through

a

metaplasia–dysplasia–carcinoma

sequence

that

generally

takes

years

[1]

.

Vagueness

of

symptoms

is

generally

responsible

for

the

delay

of

diagnosis,

which

contributes

to

the

overall

progression

of

the

disease.

In

contrast,

haematuria

is

a

unique

and

late

sign

of

an

upper

tract

urinary urothelial cancer

in almost all cases.

In

this context,

the

impact

of

imaging

on

early

diagnosis

is

known

to

be

marginal.

Second,

cigarette

smoking

is

recognised

to

be

a

substantial

risk

factor

for

both

neoplasms.

This

patient

can

be

classified

as

a

strong

smoker

based

on

both

the

number

of

cigarettes

per

day

and

the

period

of

abuse.

For

upper

tract

urinary

urothelial

cancer,

smoking

has

been

definitively

associated with pathologic

stage pT2 or higher,

high

grade,

and

multifocality

at

first

diagnosis

[2,3]

.

In

addition,

local

and distant

recurrence

rates

are

expected

to

be

higher

in

persistent

smokers

after

nephroureterectomy

[4,5]

.

Although

the

level

of

evidence

is

lower,

cigarette

smoking

is also

a

risk

factor

(with

increased

risk up

to 45%)

for

pancreatic

and

liver

cancer.

A

recent meta-analysis

of

11

selected

case–control and

cohort

studies

[6]

,

including a

total

of

1178

cases,

showed

that

smokers

are

at

increased

risk

of

development

of

biliary

tract

cancer

compared with

nonsmokers,

regardless

of

alcohol

abuse

and

history

of

gallstones.

Third,

both

kinds

of

cancer

have

poor

prognoses when

diagnosed

at

an

advanced

stage.

In particular,

for

advanced

biliary

cancer

(stage

T3–T4),

the

overall

mortality

rate

closely

follows

incidence.

For

this

tumour,

overall

mean

survival

is a mere 6 mo, whereas

the 5-yr

survival

rate does

not exceed 5%

[7]

. This means

that

surgery

is expected

to be

curative

only

in

the

subset

of

patients

found

with

stage

pT1–pT2

and

negative

surgical

margins

and

would

be

palliative

in

the

remaining

cases.

Fourth,

for

both

kinds

of

cancer

at

advanced

clinical

stage, major

international

guidelines

lack

grade

A

recom-

mendations

for

treatment.

Based

on

reduced

clinical

evidence,

the

administration

of

a

combined

chemotherapy

regimen with

cisplatin

and

gemcitabine

in

neoadjuvant

or

adjuvant

settings

is

suggested

for

both

cancers

[8,9] .

3.

Treatment

recommendation

Left

nephroureterectomy

with

or

without

retroperitoneal

lymph

node

dissection

may

be

proposed

but

will

not

influence

patient

survival, which

is

predominantly

driven

by

biliary

cancer.

In

the

absence

of

severe

haematuria,

I

would

avoid

nephroureterectomy

at

this

time.

If,

based

on

imaging, hepatic artery and vena porta

involvement

leads

to

consideration of

the biliary

cancer

as unresectable,

I would

not

recommend

an

upfront

palliative

surgery.

Due

to

normal

renal

function

and

the

absence

of

comorbidities,

I would

propose

that

the

patient

be

given

first-line

palliative

chemotherapy

with

a

combination

of

gemcitabine

and

cisplatin

for

6–8

cycles.

This

treatment

may

prolong

disease-free

survival

from

6.5 mo

to

8.4 mo

[8] .

If

the

patient

is

able

to

complete

the

scheduled

chemotherapy

regimen

with

bulky

tumour

response,

according

to

the

general

clinical

conditions,

combined

surgery

including hepatic and biliary

tract

resection and

left

nephroureterectomy

could

be

reconsidered.

In

the

case

of

completion

of

scheduled

chemotherapy

without

significant

clinical

response

but

with

proven

stabilised

disease,

I

would

consider

this

patient

to

be

a

candidate

for

observation.

Conflicts

of

interest:

The

author

has

nothing

to

disclose.

References

[1]

Hundal R, Shaffer EA. Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and out- come. Clin Epidemiol 2014;6:99–109

.

[2]

Simsir A, Sarsik B, Cureklibatir I, Sen S, Gunaydin G, Cal C. Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: stage, grade, and smoking status. Int Urol Nephrol 2011;43:1039–45

.

[3]

Rink M, Zabor EC, Furberg H, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on outcomes in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2013;64:456–64.

[4]

Hagiwara M, Kikuchi E, Tanaka N, et al. Impact of smoking status on bladder tumor recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 2013;189:2062–8

.

DOI

of

original

article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2015.07.002

.

E-mail

address:

columbo.renzo@hsr.it

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y F O C U S 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 9 0 – 9 3

92