Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  63 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 63 96 Next Page
Page Background

[25]

Krabbe LM, Lotan Y, Bagrodia A, et al. Prospective comparison of molecular signatures in urothelial cancer of the bladder and the upper urinary tract–is there evidence for discordant biology? J Urol 2014;191:926–31.

[26]

Catto JW, Azzouzi AR, Rehman I, et al. Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progres- sion in transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2903–10

.

[27]

Monteiro-Reis S, Leca L, Almeida M, et al. Accurate detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in tissue and urine by means of quantitative GDF15, TMEFF2 and VIM promoter methylation. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:226–33

.

[28]

Porten S, Siefker-Radtke AO, Xiao L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemother- apy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 2014;120:1794–9.

[29]

Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadju- vant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 2014;66:529–41

.

[30]

Roscigno M, Brausi M, Heidenreich A, et al. Lymphadenectomy at the time of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer. Eur Urol 2011;60:776–83.

E U R O P E A N

U R O L O G Y

F O C U S

1

( 2 0 1 5

)

5 4 – 6 3

63