Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  47 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 47 96 Next Page
Page Background

Clinical

Consultation Guide

Tobacco

Cessation:

A

Guide

for

Clinicians

Laura

Brandt

a , * ,

Gabriele

Fischer

b

a

Medical University

of

Vienna,

Center

for

Public Health,

Vienna,

Austria;

b

Medical University

of

Vienna, Department

of

Psychiatry

and

Psychotherapy

and

Center

for

Public Health,

Vienna,

Austria

1.

Introduction

Substance

use

disorders

(SUDs),

including

tobacco

use

disorder

(TUD;

Diagnostic

and

Statistical Manual

of Mental

Disorders

,

fifth

edition

[DSM]

code

305.1),

are

defined

as

chronic

relapsing

disorders

with

underlying

altered

brain

regions

that

control

decision making

and

judgment,

influ-

encedbypolygenetic, environmental, and cultural factors

[1] .

About

69%

of

current

smokers

reportedly want

to

quit

smoking,

and

52% make

an

unassisted

quit

attempt,

but

only

6%

successfully

quit

smoking

within

a

given

year

[2]

. The vast majority of

smokers making an attempt

to quit

relapse

to smoking, with up

to 76%

relapsing within

the

first

week

[3] .

Most patients with SUDs, however, are able

to quit

substance use over

time

[4] .

Lifetime dependence

remission

rates

(ie,

successful

cessation)

are

estimated

at

84%

for

nicotine

compared with

91%

for

alcohol,

97%

for

cannabis,

and 99%

for

cocaine

[5]

. The nicotine-dependence

time

frame

to

remission

is approximately 26 yr compared with 14 yr

for

alcohol, 6

yr

for

cannabis,

and 5

yr

for

cocaine, highlighting

the

high

addiction

potential

of

nicotine

and

the

difficulty

entailed

in

achieving

long-term

smoking

cessation

[5]

.

2.

Methods of

smoking cessation: What works well?

Treatment

interventions

for

smoking

cessation

available

in

Europe

are

separated

into

those

that

are

clearly

beneficial

(proven efficacy by

randomized controlled

trials, documen-

ted

in systematic

reviews, and suitable

for most patients) or

likely

to be beneficial

(limited proven efficacy, recommended

only with

caution

or with

limitations

in

guidelines)

[6]

.

2.1.

Interventions with

proven

efficacy

Nicotine

replacement

therapy

(NRT)

increases

smoking quit

rates

by

50–70%,

independent

of

therapeutic

setting,

NRT

form

(gum,

transdermal

patch,

nasal

spray,

inhaler,

or

sublingual

tablets

or

lozenges),

or

additional

provision

of

support

[7]

.

Varenicline

is

a

partial

agonist

on

the

nicotinergic

receptor

a

4

b

2

that

aims

to

reduce

both

withdrawal

symptoms and perceived

rewards associated with smoking.

Applying

the

recommended dose of 1 mg

varenicline

twice

daily

produces

a

two-

to

threefold

increase

in

abstinence

rates

(over 6 mo and even

longer

in some studies) compared

with placebo

[8]

. Treatment success

rates

range

from 14%

to

47%

compared with

4%

to

23%

in

placebo

groups

at

52-wk

follow-up

[8]

.

Varenicline

also

has

proven

efficacy

in

patients with

psychiatric

comorbidities

[9]

.

The

dopaminergic

antidepressant

bupropion has

shown

efficacy

in

increasing

long-term

smoking

cessation equal

to

NRT

[10]

.

Its

effect

on

smoking

cessation

is

independent

of

the

antidepressant

effect,

and

the

side

effects

seem

acceptable

because

they

rarely

lead

to

treatment

dropout.

Moreover,

the

use

of

bupropion

in

addition

to

NRT might

increase

long-term

beneficial

effects

[10]

.

A

treatment

success

rate

of

16%

has

been

reported

at

52-wk

follow-up,

compared with 22%

for varenicline and 8%

for placebo

[11] .

Notably,

pharmacologic

smoking

cessation

therapy

is

not

fully

reimbursed by health

insurance

in most European

countries despite

its proven

efficacy

and

cost-effectiveness

[12]

.

Full

reimbursement

of

smoking

cessation

therapy

could

significantly

increase

its

use

and,

subsequently,

the

number

of

successful

quitters

[13–15] .

2.2.

Interventions with

limited

efficacy

A

psychosocial

treatment

option

known

as

contingency

management

(CM)

seems

promising

to

promote

smoking

cessation

in

high-risk

populations

such

as

adolescents

or

pregnant women

and

has

low

drop-out

rates

[16,17] .

It

is

based

on

principles

of

operant

conditioning

that

offer

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y F O C U S 1 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 4 7 – 4 9

ava il abl e

at

www.sc iencedirect.com

journa l

homepage:

www.europeanurology.com

* Corresponding

author. Medical University

of Vienna,

Center

for

Public Health, Kinderspitalgasse

15,

1090 Vienna, Austria.

Tel.

+43

1

4040035000.

E-mail

address:

laura.brandt@meduniwien.ac.at

(L.

Brandt).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2014.10.004

2405-4569/

#

2015

European

Association

of Urology.

Published

by

Elsevier

B.V.

All

rights

reserved.